Blog Master G

Word. And photos, too.

Blog Master G random header image

Revisionist History

Thursday, September 18th, 2003 · No Comments

San Jose Mercury News: “President Bush said Wednesday that there has been ‘no evidence’ that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, disavowing a link that had been hinted previously by his administration.”

Am I in the Twilight Zone? Is it just me, or were the two main arguments for going to war in Iraq (1) to prevent Saddam from using (non-existent) WMD, and (2) to teach Saddam a lesson for his involvement in the 9/11 attacks? Oh wait, 9/11 was just an excuse to attack Iraq since it’s been part of the the New American Century‘s plan for years. Silly me.

Most Americans who did believe that Saddam was somehow involved in 9/11 probably just wanted to believe that for the hell of it, right? There’s no way they would’ve been at all led by the Bush administration to think there was a connection.

Tags: war