June 7, 1999 CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY Volume 2, Number 48


A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc.
Edited by Gabe Anderson
Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff

Table of Contents
* Welcome
* Capitol Action
* Letters
* News & Promotions
* The Fine Print


Welcome

Welcome to this week's Capitol Action. Last week I interviewed with two potential employers -- one in San Francisco and one here in Sacramento. As I write this Sunday night, I'm preparing to head to my Dad's house in the East Bay, where I'll be staying for at least a couple days, as the company in San Francisco wants to conduct more interviews with me tomorrow and Tuesday. I should know by early in the week where my career will begin!

Rest assured, however, that I will continue to edit this newsletter, regardless of what I'm doing with the rest of my life. So fear not, you'll continue to receive CAW via e-mail every Monday. Please always send me feedback -- I appreciate anything from a note to say hi to input on how to make this newsletter better. And, of course, letters to the editor are always welcome and encouraged.

Enjoy your week!

-Gabe

*************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to 1,000+ individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. *********************************************************************


Capitol Action for 6.7.99

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- It's usually foolhardy to say something is proceeding smoothly in the California Capitol, but this year's negotiations over the $80 billion-plus state budget actually appear on track. Our fingers are crossed.

The single most important piece of legislation considered by lawmakers during the course of a legislative session is the state budget. Not only does it define how money will be spent, it sets forth the political priorities of the governor and 120 elected officials. The negotiations are typically contentious and contrary, and agreement often comes -- when it comes -- after interminable rounds of public posturing and heated rhetoric that seem to justify the public's perception of politicians as fools, knaves or even worse.

But thus far this year, unlike so many budget deliberations of years past, has been marked more by consensus and conciliation than confrontation.

Issues that have so bitterly divided lawmakers and the governor in the past -- welfare payments, for example -- are on the way to being resolved with little difficulty. Even the most controversial item of the governor's budget blueprint, $350 million for a new state prison, was removed speedily from the budget by the legislative conference committee with little of the political fallout that has marked earlier years.

Indeed, the two-house conference committee is all but certain to wrap up its business in a week after resolving the final major pieces of the budget that deal with the partial restoration of funding for counties and local governments. Capitol observers even say the chances are excellent that the legislature will approve the budget by June 15 -- the constitutional deadline that has rarely been met for the Legislature to send the budget to the governor's desk. The governor has until July 1 to sign it into law. That, too, is a deadline that is often ignored.

The reasons for this lack of fiscal trauma are straight forward.

First, the state has roughly $4 billion in additional revenue arising from a strong economy. It's always easier to deal with an excess of money than a scarcity.

Second, both houses of the Legislature and the governor's office are controlled by Democrats, so the virtually routine confrontations that occurred during the past 16 years when Republican governors faced Democratic Legislatures is not a factor.

Third, Democrat Gray Davis is charting a moderate course that Republicans can live with, so the pitched battles over social programs and law enforcement that marked earlier budget deliberations simply don't exist this year.

And for all the media attention devoted to public education, the budget this year is probably going to provide in raw dollars roughly what it did last year, when the spending plan was written by Davis' Republican predecessor.

The simple truth is that, for journalists at least, the 1999-2000 budget is a big snooze.

And that's how it should be.


Letters

To the Editor,

Regarding your recount of the story of CDF&G's eradication of Northern Pike from Davis Lake [http://www.capenq.com/newsletter/archives/1999/may99/0247.html], I think you forget that the reason we have resource management agencies is to take the hard problems to task. Sometimes very difficult decisions have to be made which unfairly impact a minority of our state's citizens. CDF&G knew they had a difficult environmental problem to resolve; one which resulted from the illegal actions of a poorly informed individual who introduce a voracious, non-native predator into our state's aquatic ecosystem.

In the last century, striped bass were released into San Francisco Bay after they were displayed at the World Exhibition. Although a very valuable sport fishery was created, it was at the expense of the native species, some of which are now considered at peril (e.g., winter run Chinook salmon).

The residents around Davis Lake should be mad about the eradication process. However, their anger should be directed at the individuals who released the pike, not at our state's resource managers who are left with fixing the problem. California's native fish are an invaluable resource, and the thoughtless action of the person or persons who released the pike should be condemned by everyone affected by the eradication program. Your version unfairly placed CDF&G in the role of Goliath to the citizens they serve cast as David. Use of Biblical analogies aside, this is not a fair comparison in this circumstance.

- Don Kent
Hubbs-Sea World Research Institute


News & Promotions

*** State Agency Directory Update ***

With a change in governor and the first change in party in 16 years, the new governor has been making hundreds of appointments, but he isn't finished yet. We know that you need your State Agency Directory, so we've decided to process the information we have received to date and get the directory ready for the printers. Give us a couple weeks and the State Agency Directory WILL BE AVAILABLE. We apologize for the long delays and appreciate your patience. Please be assured that we will continue to pay utmost attention to the accuracy and timeliness of information, as we have for over 25 years.

*** 1999 Pocket Directory Now Available ***

Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order. NOW SHIPPING!

*** Legislators and U.S. Congress on CD-ROM ***

You can now have access to all the info in our print publications on CD-ROM, complete with regular updates via the Web or disk! More on the Legislative CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/legcd.html. More on the Congress CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/congcd.html. Legislative CD is in the final stages of development and will be available later this summer. The U.S. Congress CD is available NOW. Place your order TODAY!

*** Discounted Rate for RAND California Subscription ***

RAND California, a subscription-based service on California economic and public policy issues, has partnered with Capitol Enquiry to bring you a discounted subscription rate. More information on RAND is available here: http://ca.rand.org/about.html. To subscribe to RAND, visit this page: http://ca.rand.org/subscribe.capenq.html.

*** Committee Rosters Now Online ***

You asked for it, you got it! The current listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters.

*** Current Legislative Roster Available on Web Site ***

Looking for the current roster of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- complete with district, member name, party, room and phone number.

*** Wall Map Options ***

Looking for a poster-size map of California Legislative districts? We currently offer two types of maps. The first style is a full-color map with photos around the edge ($16.95). The other option is a blue and white line map of either the Senate, Assembly or Congress ($35 each or $50 each for laminated). Contact mailto:info@capenq.com for more information, or mailto:orders@capenq.com to place your order.


The Fine Print

ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter.

To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE.

To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE.

To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info.

Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com.

CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation.

COPYRIGHT 1998 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way.