| June 21, 1999 | CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY | Volume 2, Number 50 |
| A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc. |
| Edited by Gabe Anderson |
| Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff |
|
Table of Contents * Welcome * Capitol Action * News & Promotions * The Fine Print |
| Welcome |
|
When I count the various modes of transportation I use to get around
San Francisco on any given day, I need to make use of both hands to
tally the total. Living just outside The City and commuting there on a
daily basis (at least until I find my own place there) affords me the
unusual (and often stressful) opportunity to explore the joys of
mobility -- sans car.
Each morning when I stroll out the front door of my dad's East Bay apartment, with my rollerblades slung over my shoulder, I never know what to expect. But I look forward to the uncertainty. The first objective of the day is to get across the Bay Bridge. Sure, I could take the traditional route and catch a bus or hop on BART in Oakland, but why bother? Lined up at the bus stop is a row of cars, each of whose drivers waits patiently for two extra bodies to join them -- to form that no-waiting and toll-evading magical number three that is the Bay Area carpool. And the excitement of the carpool passenger is in meeting a new slew of individuals every week -- from lawyers to fashion designers to Smurfs. Yes, I carpooled into San Francisco last week with a woman who was the voice of one of the Smurfs. Upon reaching The City, the adventure continues. The luxury of door-to-door service does not exist in the world of the carpooler. Enter the rollerblades. I take a seat on the sidewalk among the crowd of people rushing to work, and strap on my blades. Moments later, the 15-minute jaunt from Market Street to my office begins -- a trip that would otherwise be a time-consuming headache. Navigating around San Francisco during the day -- be it to look at an apartment or to meet someone for lunch -- is, essentially, a pain. The buses are crowded and unreliable, and even if I had a car, parking would not be an option. Thus, I must rely on the door-to-door (and pricey) service of local cab companies. Whether I travel by foot or skate, bus or train, navigating my way to and around San Francisco is a daily challenge. Who would've thought that getting around in such a geographically small city could be an adventure unto itself? Have a great week, and keep that feedback coming! -Gabe *************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to 1,200+ individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. ********************************************************************* |
| Capitol Action for 6.21.99 |
|
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Few subjects bore the public more than the
intricacies of delegate selection to the national political
conventions, but the decision made last week by California Republicans
to dismantle their "winner-take-all" primary for March 2000 deserves a
close look.
The state party's executive committee, meeting privately, decided to change the existing system, in which all of California's 156 GOP delegates go to the candidate who wins the largest number of votes statewide. That means if George W. Bush Jr., Elizabeth Dole and Steve Forbes fought a close GOP primary race in California, all of the state's Republican delegates would go to the winner -- no matter how narrow the victory. The new system, however, will apportion delegates to candidates according to the election results figured district by district in each of California's 52 Congressional districts. An additional bunch of delegates would be provided to the statewide winner as a bonus. That means that one candidate could win the statewide vote by carrying most of the Congressional districts, but not receive all the convention delegates. The second- and third-place candidates also would get delegates, depending on how many districts they carried. The merits of the change aside, one thing is clear: The winner-take-all primary helps a well-financed frontrunner, and the proportional primary helps the second-tier challengers get a foot in the door. It is no accident that the principal California opponent of the change to a proportional system was Sen. Jim Brulte, a Rancho Cucamonga Republican and a co-chairman of Bush's California campaign. Bush is the GOP's presumptive presidential frontrunner, and he can only be hurt by any change in California that enables his rivals to capture delegate support. Conversely, the principal proponent was Sen. Ray Haynes, a conservative Inland Empire Republican who believes that the proportional system is fairer to a broad spectrum of GOP candidates and would prove healthy for the party and the electorate. Haynes, too, is a Bush supporter. Haynes may be right that the change -- which requires the approval of the Legislature -- will foster more campaigning, but it is doubtful whether it will help Republicans in the long run. The last thing Republicans in California, or anywhere else, need is a fractious primary. The GOP in California is licking its wounds after the debacle of the 1998 governor's race and the party is in considerable disarray. The party needs unity and strength above all, and a primary that splinters GOP support among several candidates could weaken the party as it heads into general election. Thus far, polls show Bush in a strong position to capture the nomination. So Republicans who favor a proportional primary might first ask themselves a simple question: Who among GOP ranks has a better chance of beating Gore than Bush? |
| News & Promotions |
|
*** State Agency Directory Update ***
With a change in governor and the first change in party in 16 years, the new governor has been making hundreds of appointments, but he isn't finished yet. We know that you need your State Agency Directory, so we've decided to process the information we have received to date and get the directory ready for the printers. Give us a couple weeks and the State Agency Directory WILL BE AVAILABLE. We apologize for the long delays and appreciate your patience. Please be assured that we will continue to pay utmost attention to the accuracy and timeliness of information, as we have for over 25 years. *** 1999 Pocket Directory Now Available *** Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order. NOW SHIPPING! *** Legislators and U.S. Congress on CD-ROM *** You can now have access to all the info in our print publications on CD-ROM, complete with regular updates via the Web or disk! More on the Legislative CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/legcd.html. More on the Congress CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/congcd.html. Legislative CD is in the final stages of development and will be available later this summer. The U.S. Congress CD is available NOW. Place your order TODAY! *** Discounted Rate for RAND California Subscription *** RAND California, a subscription-based service on California economic and public policy issues, has partnered with Capitol Enquiry to bring you a discounted subscription rate. More information on RAND is available here: http://ca.rand.org/about.html. To subscribe to RAND, visit this page: http://ca.rand.org/subscribe.capenq.html. *** Committee Rosters Now Online *** You asked for it, you got it! The current listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters. *** Current Legislative Roster Available on Web Site *** Looking for the current roster of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- complete with district, member name, party, room and phone number.
|
| The Fine Print |
| ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter. |
| To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE. |
| To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE. |
| To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info. |
| Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com. |
| CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation. |
| COPYRIGHT 1998 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way. |