| March 29, 1999 | CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY | Volume 2, Number 38 |
| A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc. |
| Edited by Gabe Anderson |
| Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff |
|
Table of Contents * Welcome * Capitol Action * Reader Spotlight * Letters to the Editor * News & Promotions * The Fine Print |
| Welcome |
|
Welcome to this week's Capitol Action. As many of you who have
received this year's Pocket Directory already know, there are some
factual errors in it. These errors were a result of in-house
technical problems that were not caught before the files were sent to
the printer. You will soon be receiving a correction sheet. I'd like
to extend a sincere apology for these mistakes.
I'm pleased to present our second installment of Reader Spotlight in this week's issue. That in addition to two letters to the editor makes this week more action-packed than usual! I'm happy that so many of our readers are taking an active role in CAW. Keep it up. On a personal note, I spent the weekend completely redesigning my Web site. It's still not entirely finished just yet (are sites ever totally done? =), but please take a look (www.gabeanderson.com) if you'd like. Have a great week! -Gabe *************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to hundreds of individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. ********************************************************************* |
| Capitol Action for 3.29.99 |
|
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Low-cost automobile insurance is a perennial
topic in the Capitol, but with the exception of a pair of voter-
approved ballot initiatives a decade apart, little has been done on
this issue despite more than a dozen false starts.
The reason is simple: Any real change in the multi-billion-dollar auto insurance system requires a compromise between two of the state's most powerful special interests, the trial lawyers and the insurers. Thus far an agreement has proved elusive. This year, however, insiders in the Capitol say that some form of compromise is likely to be reached, a compromise that could directly affect millions of California motorists in the place they feel most -- their pocketbooks. With both houses of the Legislature and the governor's office in the hands of Democrats for the first time in 16 years, the likelihood is that some type of low-cost policy will be approved, and that it won't take the form of no-fault, the policy traditionally favored by insurers. The lawyers have bitterly opposed no-fault, in which a motorist's insurer settles most claims outside of court regardless of who is to blame. No-fault exists in several states, and insurers contend it lowers premiums because it lowers court costs -- a savings that is passed on to the consumers. Not surprisingly, lawyers oppose no-fault because it cuts them out of fees, particularly contingency fees. And, they add, who wants to trust insurance companies to pass on their savings to customers? With no-fault off the table -- and both the lawyers and insurers say it is because Gov. Gray Davis would be unlikely to sign such a bill -- that leaves some other form of low-cost policy. There are at least two options this year, and the probability is that one of them will be approved. Both are still in draft form. The first would set a ceiling on premiums, perhaps $300 annually, for good, low-income drivers regardless of where they live. This proposal is backed by inner-city Democrats, who are allies of the lawyers. But insurers don't like it, because they say it would create subsidized auto insurance that would be cheaper in urban areas while forcing increases in low-risk areas. The second would reduce the minimum level of liability required to meet California's mandatory insurance law. Because the coverage is less, the policy would cost less. This proposal is sponsored by the insurance industry as a means of lowering costs without making changes in the tort system. What both sides don't want is the kind of costly battle that erupted in 1988, when voters approved the insurance-overhaul inititiative Proposition 103, or in 1998, when voters approved Proposition 213, which barred uninsured motorists from collecting pain-and-suffering damages. The merits of each initiative aside, both wound up costing the lawyers and insurers tens of millions of dollars. Both sides want to reach a compromise without a ballot-box war. Given the money-driven politics of the Capitol, along with Davis' self-professed moderation, the likelihood is that Option 2, a lowered liability policy, ultimately will be approved. A simple truth of politics is that voters like politicians who save them money. That means that state politicians from Davis on down view a workable low-cost auto insurance program as a big political plus, and they'll be sure to remind voters of that in coming campaigns. They are overshadowed now in Sacramento by education and the environment, but insurance issues are likely to capture increasing attention as the year progresses. You can depend on it. |
| Reader Spotlight |
|
NAME: Frank Pugh RESIDENCE: Santa Rosa, Calif. OCCUPATION: Instructor and Academic Advisor at Santa Rosa Junior College WHAT FRANK DOES: Frank has been employed at SRJC since 1979 and lectures for the departments of Electronic Technology, Applied Technology, and Guidance. He has authored six text books, and four magazine articles in the area of Electronic Technology. Frank also created several recipes for Sunset Magazine, and cooking has turned out to be one of his favorite hobbies. Frank is also serving his third term as an elected representative to the Board of Education for Santa Rosa City Schools District. Frank is happily married to Ann, and they have two active daughters, Caroline 14, and Elizabeth 16. FAVORITE BOOKS: Cannery Row and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. I think that there are cultural lessons in the development of California that need to be remembered. PERSONAL GOAL: To sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom. QUOTE: "When it comes to Education, the California State Legislature couldn't organize a one-car parade." * Would YOU like to be profiled here? Contact webmaster@capenq.com. * |
| Letters |
|
To the Editor,
Every week you report in detail on things and issues in Sacramento.
Then you say "stay tuned." I do. But I never read anything that either
keeps score or tracks what the results were. Just letting you know.
Brad Senden To the Editor, [From last week's issue, www.capenq.com/newsletter/archives/1999/march99/0237.html]: "Given Davis' style and his penchant for describing himself as a moderate, the likelihood is that he will order a phase-out. But that move, too, is fraught with uncertainty and contains the potential for a prolonged court fight to thwart his decision. "One thing is certain: Davis will have to take a stand on one side or the other. And that's something that politicians just don't like to do." A moderate orders a phase-out, which is "likely." But then you say he has to take a stand on one side or the other. He can do nothing, end it immediately, or phase it out -- that's three sides. There are probably more, too.
Just being picky about your rhetoric.
Wayne Phillips |
| News & Promotions |
|
*** 1999 Pocket Directory Now Available ***
Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order. NOW SHIPPING! *** Legislators and U.S. Congress on CD-ROM *** You can now have access to all the info in our print publications on CD-ROM, complete with regular updates via the Web or disk! More on the Legislative CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/legcd.html. More on the Congress CD here: http://www.capenq.com/brochure/congcd.html. Both CDs begin shipping in May. Place your order TODAY! *** Discounted Rate for RAND California Subscription *** RAND California, a subscription-based service on California economic and public policy issues, has parterned with Capitol Enquiry to bring you a discounted subscription rate. More information on RAND is available here: http://ca.rand.org/about.html. To subscribe to RAND, visit this page: http://ca.rand.org/subscribe.capenq.html. *** Committee Rosters Now Online *** You asked for it, you got it! The current listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters. *** Current Legislative Roster Available on Web Site *** Looking for the current roster of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- complete with district, member name, party, room and phone number. *** Wall Map Options *** Looking for a poster-size map of California Legislative districts? We currently offer two types of maps. The first style is a full-color map with photos around the edge ($16.95). The other option is a blue and white line map of either the Senate, Assembly or Congress ($35 each or $50 each for laminated). Contact mailto:info@capenq.com for more information, or mailto:orders@capenq.com to place your order. |
| The Fine Print |
| ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter. |
| To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE. |
| To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE. |
| To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info. |
| Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com. |
| CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation. |
| COPYRIGHT 1999 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way. |