January 20, 2000 CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY Volume 3, Number 26


A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc.
Edited by Gabe Anderson
Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff

Table of Contents
* Welcome
* Capitol Action
* News & Promotions
* The Fine Print


Welcome

Greetings all, and welcome to 2000! I hope your New Year's Eve celebration was as enjoyable as mine -- Jen and I threw a small party for some friends and enjoyed the amazing fireworks over the San Francisco Bay. What I found even more incredible, though, was the San Francisco-sized (as in, the size of The City itself from our view here on Treasure Island) cruise ship that was docked in the Bay as the new year rolled in. I'm no cruise ship expert, but this baby must have been the biggest ship on the planet. Any ship experts have any input? (I got fireworks and mammoth ship on video if you'd like a reference.)

So here we are, just several days into the new year, and already it's an exhausting one for me. Saturday night I headed to Sacramento, where, along with a Vassar friend who's visiting from D.C., I crashed at my old home in preparation for a Sunday ski trip. Enoch (the D.C. friend), my brother Peter and I planned to wake up before 6 Sunday morning to head to the slopes. We did.

But getting to Kirkwood was half the fun. Normally a two-hour trip (assuming ideal conditions), our Sunday drive (which began just after 7 a.m. in Sacramento) lasted four long hours. A small part of the delay was due to a missed turn along the way, but most of the slow-going trip can be blamed on the ridiculous demands of our very own Cal-Trans: It snowed three inches Saturday night, and even though Highway 88 was perfectly drivable the next morning, the officials required all cars to use snow chains. I'm sure their top concern is my safety, but please, Cal-Trans folks, be a little more realistic when deciding when my safety is in jeopardy. Enoch summed it up best: "Chains? We have people riding MOPEDS straight up snowy mountains in D.C. And they've never even HEARD of chains."

On a final note (I know I've been rather long-winded this week), despite thin cover, the skiing at Kirkwood was tons of fun. Not great skiing, per se, but I loved being back on the slopes.

-Gabe

*************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to 1,500+ individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. *********************************************************************


Capitol Action for 1.3.00

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The wonderful thing about the argument over the Y2K "bug" is the circular logic explicit on both sides.

To those who believed that the New Year's arrival marked the beginning of a technological Armageddon, the fact that 2000 came smoothly was the result of efficiency and planning. Without that, they say, planes would have fallen from the skies, missiles would have been launched, ATMs would have failed, elevators would have been stuck and wide swaths of the nation would have been plunged into darkness. The fact that this didn't happen, the argument goes, is ample evidence that effective planning avoided the end of civilization as we know it.

Then there are others -- like the CAW staff -- who believe the Y2K "bug" was the product of pure and profound hyperbole, generated and perpetuated by armies of consultants, vendors and others who, while acknowledging the modern dependency on computers, convinced themselves that the bug was the harbinger of a massive meltdown.

The argument is just as fierce -- fiercer, in fact -- than before the New Year dawned.

To whatever extent the Y2K problem existed, and there are many experts who say it did, it is also apparent that the problem was overstated. Spending to correct the "bug" in the United States alone is estimated at between $100 billion and $225 billion, including hundreds of millions of dollars in California alone, and one estimate of the global cost of Y2K compliance has been put at $500 billion. Was all this spending justified?

Reports over the weekend in The New York Times and Washington Post suggested that the problem was overblown by "orders of magnitude," and that the fears about Y2K were driven, at least in part, by a confluence of factors unique to American society.

This nation's reliance on computers, the financial stake of consultants and others in exaggerating Y2K and the fears of agencies, public and private, that if they did nothing they would leave themselves vulnerable to a legion of lawyers lining up to file Y2K-related lawsuits, combined to feed a sort of Y2K hysteria.

The old joke about the man clapping his hands in the desert comes to mind.

"Why are you clapping your hands?" he is asked. "To keep the elephants away," he answers.

"But there aren't any elephants within 5,000 miles of here," he is told.

"See, it works!" he answers.

Similarly, the fact that nothing much happened is proof positive to some that the Y2K preparations worked. And the fact that nothing much happened is proof positive to others that there was never much of a problem to begin with.

Perhaps a meaningful test of the importance of the Y2K problem will occur this week, when thousands of business computing systems will reboot. But it seems likely that the outcome will be similar to that experienced over the New Year, when it became apparent minutes after midnight that little, if anything, was going to happen.

P.T. Barnum once said there was a "sucker born every minute." For those of us who agonized, and emptied our wallets, over Y2K there seems to be evidence once again that the old showman knew what he was talking about.


News & Promotions

*** NOW SHIPPING 1999-2000 STATE AGENCY DIRECTORY! ***

This handy directory lists alphabetically all agency and department-level organizations, most division and branch level offices. Names and titles of state offices and officials, with addresses, phone and fax numbers. Where a vacancy exists the position is listed without a name. Convenient 4" x 9" fits in your briefcase or on your desk. With the election of a Democratic Governor, major shifts are occurring in personnel and state agency structure. Order now at: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** NOW TAKING ORDERS FOR 2000 PUBLICATIONS! ***

*** 2000 Pocket Directory of the California Legislature ***

You need the 2000 Pocket Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order, or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** 2000 U.S. Congress Directory ***

Order the 2000 U.S. Congress Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Congressional contact information for the entire U.S. Order the newest edition today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** UPDATED INFORMATION NOW AVAILABLE ONLINE ***

*** Committee Rosters ***

You asked for it, you got it! The updated listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters.

*** Current Legislative Rosters ***

Looking for the current rosters of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- updated with district, member name, party, room and phone number.


The Fine Print

ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter.

To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE.

To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE.

To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info.

Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com.

CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation.

COPYRIGHT 1998 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way.