January 10, 2000 CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY Volume 3, Number 27


A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc.
Edited by Gabe Anderson
Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff

Table of Contents
* Welcome
* Capitol Action
* Letters
* News & Promotions
* The Fine Print


Welcome

Welcome to this week's Capitol Action. I trust you've all settled into the new millennium and have put the Y2K fears aside. Rather than bore you this week with anecdotes from my life (all I really did this past week was acquire a new bed, which I transported from Sacramento to San Francisco, and saw "Man on the Moon" Sunday night), I'll leave you with my first prediction for next New Year's: "2001: A Space Odyssey" will be impossible to find -- be it for rent or sale. That's right. Buy your copy now. You read it here first and you'll thank me 356 days from now (don't forget that this is a leap year) when everyone on your block is scrambling for the hottest movie of the year. And you can rent your copy out for 100 bucks a night -- up to, but not including, the night of New Year's Eve (you'll want it for yourself that night).

-Gabe

*************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to 1,500+ individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. *********************************************************************


Capitol Action for 1.10.00

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The public couldn't care less, but to political junkies, reporters and ranking bureaucrats, the time-honored procedure known as selective leaking is, when it's done effectively, a beautiful thing to watch. That's what happened during the weekend.

And if the Davis administration's communications minions didn't hit a grand slam -- as former Gov. Wilson's staff did the year that class-size reduction was developed for schools -- they did hit an inside-the-park home run.

The issue this time was nursing homes. As part of his $85 billion-plus budget to be announced this week, the governor has proposed a $270 million plan to improve nursing home care, including more inspectors on the job, financial incentives for those who work in the facilities, tougher enforcement and tax credits for those who care for elderly relatives in their homes.

By anybody's yardstick, and absent any unpleasant details, these are reforms that are long overdue. And, equally important to a politician like Davis, they are popular.

But instead of unveiling the reforms at his formal budget briefing on Monday, the governor's staff selectively briefed reporters on the issue over the weekend. That allowed the reporters to write extensive stories on the governor's plan for their Sunday editions, which are the papers that have the highest circulation. The spoon-fed stories reflected little, if any, independent investigation. Rather, they reflected the administration's position on a high-profile issue, and they got that position out front without any fundamental criticism.

For a politician and his communications staff, this is just about as good as it gets: Versions appeared on A1, or at least in the front sections, of newspapers across the state, including the Los Angeles Times, the San Diego Union, the Orange County Register and the Los Angeles Daily News. And other papers, such as the Sacramento Bee, the Oakland Tribune and the San Francisco Examiner, had their tales as well.

A reader might well ask, why do reporters -- and their editors -- allow themselves to be manipulated this way?

The answers go to the heart of competitive journalism.

Reporters want to get a story first. If they can't, they want to make sure they don't miss a big story that their rivals have. The governor and his communications staff know this. So, they invited reporters to the briefings, inundated them with material and sat back to watch the stories appear. Which they did.

Moreover, reporters like to get stories in advance of their official release. So, the reporters are happy because they get a good story. The politicians are happy because the stories, almost exclusively, reflect their perspective. Presumably, the readers are happy because they learn what their governor is thinking.

In at least one case this weekend, the governor made himself available for a personal interview, and in another provided material not given to the other reporters. This, too, is beneficial, at least from the administration's perspective, because it sewed seeds of dissension in the Capitol Press Corps.

Readers don't see the fabric of information-gathering behind the stories.

But in the end, does that really matter?


Letters

To the Editor,

I believe that, as with most issues that involve politics and (potential) litigation, the truth is almost midway between the extremists' positions. Not being as sensational as the extremes, the truth is usually ignored by the media.

I don't believe that, absent precautions taken in reaction to the scaremongers, civilization would have self-destructed or been destroyed by nuclear Armageddon. But I do believe that without the doomsday publicity the problem would have been ignored, and the "millennium" would not have been the relative nonevent that it was. In other words, this was the flip side of the self-fulfilling prophecy: the self-defeating prophecy.

- Louis Jones
San Diego, Calif.

To the Editor,

Congratulations on completely polarizing an issue; specific symptoms of the software malady did evidence themselves, albeit not in an endemic fashion. I applaud your honesty and candor in describing how far out on one pole you and your staff place yourselves. I detest how you do not allow for a reasonable position, on either side of the exact center. Who put you in the judgement seat?

- Landon Miller
Lake Forest, Calif.

The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America put this newsletter in the judgment seat. And what's so unreasonable about taking a position on an issue? Had we taken the "exact center" -- or even the good ol' "center" -- you'd have nothing with which to disagree. --Ed.

To the Editor,

First, there are no mountains in DC (I know because I lived there for seven years). Second, the people in DC have no idea how to deal with snow, and adopt a bunker mentality the every once or twice a year that it does. Many people in DC have never seen snow before, because they come from a place where there is no snow and they're just there to log a couple years of DC experience, and they buy up all the toilet paper and canned goods as soon as the weather person points at a snowflake.

So while Enoch's point was amusing, it's utterly false. You might want to know that before repeating it in print. - Tim McRae
Planning and Conservation League and Foundation

Whoops. I guess I should've mentioned last week that Enoch's a stand-up comedian. Next time I print a comic remark, I'll be sure to annotate it as such. --Ed.


News & Promotions

*** NOW SHIPPING 1999-2000 STATE AGENCY DIRECTORY! ***

This handy directory lists alphabetically all agency and department-level organizations, most division and branch level offices. Names and titles of state offices and officials, with addresses, phone and fax numbers. Where a vacancy exists the position is listed without a name. Convenient 4" x 9" fits in your briefcase or on your desk. With the election of a Democratic Governor, major shifts are occurring in personnel and state agency structure. Order now at: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** NOW TAKING ORDERS FOR 2000 PUBLICATIONS! ***

*** 2000 Pocket Directory of the California Legislature ***

You need the 2000 Pocket Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order, or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** 2000 U.S. Congress Directory ***

Order the 2000 U.S. Congress Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Congressional contact information for the entire U.S. Order the newest edition today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260.

*** UPDATED INFORMATION NOW AVAILABLE ONLINE ***

*** Committee Rosters ***

You asked for it, you got it! The updated listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters.

*** Current Legislative Rosters ***

Looking for the current rosters of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- updated with district, member name, party, room and phone number.


The Fine Print

ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter.

To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE.

To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE.

To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info.

Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com.

CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation.

COPYRIGHT 1998 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way.