| February 6, 2000 | CAPITOL ACTION WEEKLY | Volume 3, Number 31 |
| A free weekly newsletter brought to you by Capitol Enquiry, Inc. |
| Edited by Gabe Anderson |
| Capitol Reports by Capitol Action Staff |
|
Table of Contents * Capitol Action * Letters * News & Promotions * The Fine Print |
| *************************** ADVERTISEMENT *************************** YOUR AD HERE! Want to send a message to 1,600+ individuals each week? Place your ad here! This newsletter is not spam, so everyone who receives it has asked for it. For rates and other information on advertising, drop a message to ads@capenq.com. ********************************************************************* |
| Capitol Action for 2.7.00 |
|
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Exercising one's right to vote often is not
easy: The choices can be confusing, the issues clouded, the timing
inconvenient and the ballot complicated. The presidential primary
election coming up in a month, laughably called an "open" primary,
adds a new layer of confusion -- the selection of delegates to the
national conventions that will choose the major parties' nominees.
California law says that any voter can vote for any candidate in the primary election. A Democrat can cross over and vote for a Republican, for example, as can an independent or a Peace and Freedom voter, and vice versa. But as far as convention delegates go, this vote is misleading: The parties' rules say that the only votes that count for delegate selection are those cast by the members of that candidate's party. That means, for example, that if you are a Democrat you can vote for Republican John McCain. But the number of delegates that California sends to the Republican convention, perhaps 16 percent of the national total, will be decided only on the basis of the Republican votes; the others won't count. This means it is quite possible for a candidate to win the popular tally, but still lose the delegate tally -- and it is the delegate count that determines who the presidential nominees ultimately will be. This does not please independent or decline-to-state voters, or the disaffected voters in the major parties, who want their choices to count. But that's the way it is. The Democratic and Republican national parties, often at loggerheads, were united on this one issue. They say their respective nominees should be chosen only by delegates selected by their own party members. They are fighting this case in the courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court says it will consider the issue -- but not until after the California primary is over. But many voters disagree with the party pros. Democracy, they argue, entails an unfettered vote. And it is hard to argue with them. There is general agreement that moving up the primary election to March 7 -- it used to be held in June -- will give California more say in the ultimate selection of a presidential nominee. In past years, that issue often was decided before California voters went to the polls. But the extent of that impact is uncertain. Some experts say flatly that whoever wins the primaries in California will win the parties' nominations, but that is by no means clear. Adding to the confusion is the raw number of candidates -- nearly two dozen of them will appear on all voters' presidential ballots alone. And the delegate issue, of course, only applies to the presidential contests. The U.S. Senate, congressional and legislative races are tallied according to the popular vote. In the end, California voters won only a symbolic victory when they rejected, at the ballot box, the notion of a closed primary. The March 7 election is "open" in the sense that all voters have an array of choices, but it remains firmly closed in most critical choice on the ballot, the choice for president. No wonder voters are confused.
|
| Letters |
|
To the Editor,
Your reference to Bob Hertzberg as "obscure" validates your reference to yourself as working full time and editing the newsletter from San Francisco. He may be "obscure" to you, but as Chair of the powerful Rules Committee, a member of the Appropriations Committee, and a long time member of the leadership of the Assembly, he is anything but "obscure." Little has happened around the Assembly the last few years without his participation. Speaker Villaraigosa, who has, in two years, brought back collegiality to the recently strife-ridden lower house relies still and has relied heavily on Hertzberg for support and counsel. They are housemates and good friends. Hertzberg has been part and parcel of the leadership, behind the scenes and in front. He is anything but "obscure." And Hertzberg knows the nuances and ins and outs of the Assembly as well as most who have been around a lot longer. He is smart and hard working, and well known in Los Angeles as well as Sacramento. He just got elected with an unanimous vote, the first time in my memory for a non-incumbent Speaker. I suggest you spend less time telling us of your adventures in space and more time in Sacramento, where you may learn something about how the Legislature operates. That Mr. Hertzberg is congenial, talented and hardworking, few would doubt. Few also would doubt that he is virtually unknown beyond the confines of the Capitol and his Los Angeles district. That he is housemates with Villaraigosa is interesting but irrelevant. That he is a member of the Appropriations Committee, along with a number of others, also is no certificate of stature: How many people in the Press Corps, much less the public, can even name the members of that committee? The test of a strong speaker is the ability to collect votes and successfully push legislation -- something that Villaraigosa failed to do, for example, on MICRA. Indeed, Hertzberg became the speaker designate in part because Villaraigosa was unable to maintain the speakership while running for mayor of Los Angeles. The fact that Hertzberg had bipartisan support means little in terms of his potential clout as speaker. Jesse Unruh, Willie Brown and even Curt Pringle ruled bitterly divided houses, but few doubt their effectiveness. They had substantial legislative track records before becoming speaker. Will Hertzberg be their equal? He hasn't shown it yet. Finally, the CAW staff, based in Sacramento, has covered the Capitol for three decades, nearly 10 times as long as Mr. Hertzberg has been lawmaker. The adjective "obscure," not a pejorative as you seem to suggest, stands. --The CAW Staff
|
| News & Promotions |
|
*** NOW SHIPPING 1999-2000 STATE AGENCY DIRECTORY! ***
This handy directory lists alphabetically all agency and department-level organizations, most division and branch level offices. Names and titles of state offices and officials, with addresses, phone and fax numbers. Where a vacancy exists the position is listed without a name. Convenient 4" x 9" fits in your briefcase or on your desk. With the election of a Democratic Governor, major shifts are occurring in personnel and state agency structure. Order now at: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260. *** NOW TAKING ORDERS FOR 2000 PUBLICATIONS! *** *** 2000 Pocket Directory of the California Legislature *** You need the 2000 Pocket Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Legislative contact information. Order the newest edition of "the little red book" today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order, or fax (916) 442-1260. *** 2000 U.S. Congress Directory *** Order the 2000 U.S. Congress Directory now! To be published March of 2000. Stay up-to-date on Congressional contact information for the entire U.S. Order the newest edition today! Place your secure online order through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/order or fax (916) 442-1260. *** UPDATED INFORMATION NOW AVAILABLE ONLINE *** *** Committee Rosters *** You asked for it, you got it! The updated listings for both Assembly and Senate committees are now available through our Web site. Point your browser to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the rosters. *** Current Legislative Rosters *** Looking for the current rosters of the Assembly or Senate? Head on over to http://www.capenq.com/gov/info.html for links to the current lists -- updated with district, member name, party, room and phone number.
|
| The Fine Print |
| ARCHIVES of this newsletter are available through our Web site: http://www.capenq.com/newsletter. |
| To SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - SUBSCRIBE. |
| To UNSUBSCRIBE to Capitol Action Weekly, send an e-mail to webmaster@capenq.com with the subject NEWSLETTER - UNSUBSCRIBE. |
| To place an ADVERTISEMENT in this newsletter, send a message to ads@capenq.com for more info. |
| Any letter submitted for publication should be brief and to the point. All letters are subject to editing and should include the author's name, e-mail address, and city of residence, all of which will be printed with the letter. A phone number should be included with all letters, in case the need for verification should arise. Letters should be sent to webmaster@capenq.com. |
| CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. is a private, California-based corporation. |
| COPYRIGHT 1998 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. All rights reserved. Capitol Action Weekly is for informational use only. Redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. Capitol Action Weekly may be reproduced in either electronic or print form only if the format is not altered in any way. |